Skip to main content
Federal Lobbying Data · Senate LDA Filings · Updated Quarterly
LobbySpend
Campaign Finance

Citizens United v. FEC

The landmark 2010 Supreme Court decision that ruled corporations and unions have First Amendment rights to spend unlimited amounts on independent political expenditures.

In Depth

Understanding Citizens United v. FEC


Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (558 U.S. 310, 2010) is the Supreme Court decision that fundamentally reshaped American campaign finance law. The case arose when Citizens United, a conservative nonprofit, sought to air a film critical of Hillary Clinton within 30 days of a primary election, which was prohibited by the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (McCain-Feingold).

In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that the government cannot restrict independent political expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions, holding that such spending constitutes protected speech under the First Amendment. The decision overturned portions of the BCRA and prior precedent (Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 1990). The practical effect was to allow corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts from their treasuries on independent expenditures -- communications that support or oppose candidates without coordinating with their campaigns.

This decision, combined with the D.C. Circuit's SpeechNow.org v. FEC ruling later in 2010, led to the creation of Super PACs. Citizens United did not directly change lobbying law, but it significantly expanded the influence ecosystem by allowing organizations to combine lobbying with unlimited electoral spending.

Organizations that lobby heavily can now also spend unlimited amounts supporting or opposing the same officials they lobby, creating a more integrated influence infrastructure. The decision remains one of the most controversial in modern American jurisprudence.

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions


What does citizens united v. fec mean?

The landmark 2010 Supreme Court decision that ruled corporations and unions have First Amendment rights to spend unlimited amounts on independent political expenditures.

Why is citizens united v. fec important in lobbying?

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (558 U.S. 310, 2010) is the Supreme Court decision that fundamentally reshaped American campaign finance law. The case arose when Citizens United, a conservative nonprofit, sought to air a film critical of Hillary Clinton within 30 days of a primary ele...

← All glossary terms